[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [conculture] CHAT: con-this'n'that

To: conculture@onelist.com
Subject: Re: [conculture] CHAT: con-this'n'that
From: Padraic Brown <pbrown@polaris.umuc.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 13:28:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "Raymond A. Brown" <raybrown@clara.co.uk>, Padraic Brown <pbrown@nova.umuc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990518210534.2906D-100000@pandora.earthlight.co.nz>
Reply-To: celticonlang@lists.Colorado.EDU
Sender: owner-celticonlang@lists.Colorado.EDU

On Wed, 19 May 1999, Andrew Smith wrote:

> There seems three main questions in the 16th century *there*, the fate of
> British Protestants, the collusion between the British monarches, the king
> of France and the Pope to contain Spanish influence, and the fate of the
> independant Dutch provinces.

Humpf!  No Irish Question!?  I suppose it's back to bogs to think a new
Question ...

> - andrew.
> 
> Andrew Smith, Intheologus 			hobbit@earthlight.co.nz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [conculture] CHAT: con-this'n'that
  - From: Andrew Smith <hobbit@mail.earthlight.co.nz>

References:
- Re: [conculture] CHAT: con-this'n'that
  - From: Andrew Smith <hobbit@mail.earthlight.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: [conculture] CHAT: con-this'n'that
Next by Date: Re: [conculture] CHAT: con-this'n'that
Prev by thread: Re: [conculture] CHAT: con-this'n'that
Next by thread: Re: [conculture] CHAT: con-this'n'that
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread