Re: nu alltr e gw alltr?

[Andrew Smith <hobbit@mail.earthlight.co.nz>]

On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Raymond A. Brown wrote:

> 'Brithenig' is OK - after all, the modern Bretons are still happy to
> perpetuate the name under the form 'Brezhoneg' (where 'zh' is cunningly
> pronounced /z/ or /h/ according to dialect and derives from earlier [T]   :)
>
True. 
> 
> PS - having stirred the pot, so to speak, with the mentioning that some
> other Italian preps. cause gemination & with discussion of partitive forms,
> I think I ought to do some research also  ;)  I'll download the latest
> version of the Brithenig grammar some time to day (I think my hard copy is
> a little out of date) and take it from there - but don't expect immediate
> results.
> 
That would be good.  I don't think you will find many major changes
between older grammars and the current one. (which reminds me - must
finish the update!)

- andrew.

Andrew Smith, Intheologus 			hobbit@earthlight.co.nz
Life is short, so am I!

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GL d+ s-:+ a32 C+ UL P? L E? W++ N+ o-- K- w O M+ V PS++ PE- Y+ PGP- t+*
5+ X- R tv b+++ DI+ D-- G e++ h- !r y-
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------