Does "co" make everything following it part of the tanru? Or just the next (one) word? How does it differ from a normal tanru in meaning? With a jek?
It inverts the adjoining brivlas while preserving their original tanru relation. So "melbi nixli" (seltau-tertau) and "nixli co melbi" (tertau-seltau) are the same in meaning.Such inversion comes in handy when you want to insert some sumti into the seltau on the level of the main bridi:ko'a nixli co melbi miShe is a girl who looks beautiful to meOtherwise:ko'a melbi be mi nixliShe is a beutiful-to-me type of girl
It inverts the adjoining brivlas while preserving their original tanru relation. So "melbi nixli" (seltau-tertau) and "nixli co melbi" (tertau-seltau) are the same in meaning.
Such inversion comes in handy when you want to insert some sumti into the seltau on the level of the main bridi:
ko'a nixli co melbi miShe is a girl who looks beautiful to me
Otherwise:
ko'a melbi be mi nixliShe is a beutiful-to-me type of girl
>>525Can I say "[melbi co mi tricu]"? What about "[melbi tricu co xamgu]"?
>>525
Can I say "[melbi co mi tricu]"? What about "[melbi tricu co xamgu]"?
>>529"mi", which is a sumti, cannot come after "co", which joins only words that can be a selbri."melbi tricu co xamgu" is grammatical. It's read as((melbi tricu) co (xamgu)), and is identical in meaning with(xamgu ke (melbi tricu))or(xamgu (melbi bo tricu))
>>529
"mi", which is a sumti, cannot come after "co", which joins only words that can be a selbri.
"melbi tricu co xamgu" is grammatical. It's read as
((melbi tricu) co (xamgu))
, and is identical in meaning with
(xamgu ke (melbi tricu))
or
(xamgu (melbi bo tricu))
Inversion of tanru: http://jbotcan.org/cllc/c5/s8.html
- wakaba 3.0.7 + futaba + futallaby -