Shouldn't "coi rodo" be "coi doi rodo"?
>>513 I do not know. [zo doi] makes the following word a name, although it does direct the vocative. But it would be like saying "Salutation, O' All, you (do something)..."I would use a terminator for clarity as well.
>>513
I do not know. [zo doi] makes the following word a name, although it does direct the vocative. But it would be like saying "Salutation, O' All, you (do something)..."
I would use a terminator for clarity as well.
>>514 How does one know when a vocative ends, anyway (with or without a terminator)?
>>514
How does one know when a vocative ends, anyway (with or without a terminator)?
coi rodo works as well, because all cmavo of COI take a cmene after them; it's even in the definition of DOI that it can be elided after COI.you know when a vocative ends, when the cmene after it is complete or you have a terminator (if that helps you ;) )
coi rodo works as well, because all cmavo of COI take a cmene after them; it's even in the definition of DOI that it can be elided after COI.
you know when a vocative ends, when the cmene after it is complete or you have a terminator (if that helps you ;) )
No, it shouldn't be coi doi rodo. It can be, but it is more than necessary.# All of these are valid uses of cmavo of selma'o COIcoi doki'e dodoi docoi djanki'e djandoi djancoi ro doki'e ro dodoi ro dodoi ro do [do'u]coi djan [do'u]ki'e kriltic [do'u]ju'i lojbo [do'u]Vocatives end with do'u, but it's mostly elidable.
No, it shouldn't be coi doi rodo. It can be, but it is more than necessary.
coi doi rodo
# All of these are valid uses of cmavo of selma'o COI
coi do
ki'e do
doi do
coi djan
ki'e djan
doi djan
coi ro do
ki'e ro do
doi ro do
doi ro do [do'u]
coi djan [do'u]
ki'e kriltic [do'u]
ju'i lojbo [do'u]
Vocatives end with do'u, but it's mostly elidable.
do'u
Useful vocatives: http://jbotcan.org/jbobaurei/?q=vocative
- wakaba 3.0.7 + futaba + futallaby -