In the 3rd paragraph of {ni'o re mo'o},{ni'o [...] .i la'a da nitcu lo nu klama lo nenri kei gi'e ku'i mutce senpi [...] .i ca lo pu cerni ca lo nu lo vorme cu stela ganlo zo'u ro da djica lo nu klama lo nenri be lo gy kumfa}, {da} is used twice without definition. Is it considered to have the same referent?
In the 3rd paragraph of {ni'o re mo'o},
{ni'o [...] .i la'a da nitcu lo nu klama lo nenri kei gi'e ku'i mutce senpi [...] .i ca lo pu cerni ca lo nu lo vorme cu stela ganlo zo'u ro da djica lo nu klama lo nenri be lo gy kumfa}
, {da} is used twice without definition. Is it considered to have the same referent?
In this case, it just happens that {da} will take values from the people in the house both times.But in general a new quantification is like starting with a new variable. You can't quantify with the same variable twice, so a second quantifier forces the variable to take values from a (possibly) different set.
In this case, it just happens that {da} will take values from the people in the house both times.
But in general a new quantification is like starting with a new variable. You can't quantify with the same variable twice, so a second quantifier forces the variable to take values from a (possibly) different set.
- wakaba 3.0.7 + futaba + futallaby -