What implications does [zo <<le] have that “the” does not?What does [le la le mlatu .xarold. ku le gerku] mean? How about: [[le la le mlatu .xarold. ku cu gerku]?If an CVCCV or CCVCV word is a gismu (although most do not have meaning), then what does [la .mlat.] mean? [la mlatu] or [la mlati]?
What implications does [zo <<le] have that “the” does not?
What does [le la le mlatu .xarold. ku le gerku] mean? How about: [[le la le mlatu .xarold. ku cu gerku]?
If an CVCCV or CCVCV word is a gismu (although most do not have meaning), then what does [la .mlat.] mean? [la mlatu] or [la mlati]?
"la mlat", "la mlatu" and "la mlati" possibly refer to three different people or things, none of them is equivalent to another. "mlat" is a cmevla, "mlatu" a defined gismu and "mlati" an undefined gismu form. All three can be used as names with "la".The "le la le" forms given are both ungrammatical.
"la mlat", "la mlatu" and "la mlati" possibly refer to three different people or things, none of them is equivalent to another. "mlat" is a cmevla, "mlatu" a defined gismu and "mlati" an undefined gismu form. All three can be used as names with "la".
The "le la le" forms given are both ungrammatical.
- wakaba 3.0.7 + futaba + futallaby -