[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rromei-Geldyghei lyngvei (Roman-Celtic langs)

To: Multiple recipients of list CONLANG <CONLANG@BROWNVM.BROWN.EDU>
Subject: Re: Rromei-Geldyghei lyngvei (Roman-Celtic langs)
From: Nik Taylor <fortytwo@UFL.EDU>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 23:37:21 -0400
Organization: University of Florida
References: <3539585F.7AF43061@ufl.edu> <1396834302.17552454@atlmug.org>
Reply-To: Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@BROWNVM.BROWN.EDU>
Sender: Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@BROWNVM.BROWN.EDU>

Sam Bryant wrote:

> But the vocative in Latin, which everyone will agree is a case quite distinct
> from the nominative, is the same as the nominative except for 2nd declension
> words in -us. Does it not exist in every other declension? Of course it exists.
See my reply to Padraic.

--
If all Printers were determin'd not to print any thing till they were
sure it would offend no body, there would be very little printed." - Ben
Franklin
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Rampart/9785/

References:
- Re: Rromei-Geldyghei lyngvei (Roman-Celtic langs)
  - From: Nik Taylor <fortytwo@UFL.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: Rromei-Geldyghei lyngvei (Roman-Celtic langs)
Next by Date: Re: Rromei-Geldyghei lyngvei (Roman-Celtic langs)
Prev by thread: Re: Rromei-Geldyghei lyngvei (Roman-Celtic langs)
Next by thread: Re: Rromei-Geldyghei lyngvei (Roman-Celtic langs)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread